Feedback Official Nulling Team

[Tony 5,207]

I've seen this suggestion before, and my opinion on the matter hasn't changed one bit: it's a concept that just wouldn't work.

 

We already have our Uploader group and I believe that to be quite sufficient as these users are trusted enough to be able to submit quality content without having their content sit in queue awaiting Staff's review and approval. As has been pointed out already, there are far too many people on WebFlake who have their own interpretation of a "null" and what would make an exceptional null. I for one, have no interest in seeing the WebFlake community promise become one of ambiguity. I also feel that it's a complete and utter senseless waste of time for Staff to have to continually review alleged "nulls" when we have an internal list of acceptable sources.

 

There are already trustworthy sources out there, and I believe that Staff (as well as our Uploaders) are more than capable of finding and sharing that content here.

 

I'm not opposed to leaving this topic open.. feedback is obviously always welcome, but if you're not prepared to defend your suggestion from constructive criticism Onlkyl, then I suggest you move on from this topic until you've grown a thicker skin.

[Onlykl 6]

And who is in uploader group?

[Skreamzja 160]

And who is in uploader group?

 

HSBC was, but recently got promoted to the junior moderator group.

[Kingy 317]

And who is in uploader group?

 

BornToBe pretty much hit the nail on the head. HSBC was the only user in the Uploader usergroup but has recently been promoted to Junior Moderator. We have no set requirements to become eligible for the uploader group other than upload good quality and clean files that meet our upload policy.

 

Thanks,

 

Kingy

[Guest Drewbie]

Yes, we need to have a source we can trust. We know all to well there are allot of blackhats out there that edit the code to either just add some backlinks or steal entire databases and or personal information.

If webflake establishes itself as a trustworthy source, it drives traffic and popularity. I am as most of your users not familair with the scen and who i can trust and who i can not. That beeing said i am certain webflake staff and associates do not go over every nulled piece of script available for download, as such i can only conclude there is a percentage wich is harmfull.

If webflake puts trust in it's nullers and only allows these to be uploaded it creates sources your users can trust and in return drives traffic. Team WF? If you allow the same piece software that is nulled 10 to 20 times over and available for download it does not make sense to anyone. Whats different, what did this nuller do that the other one didn't, are they exactly the same, does it contain harmfull code?

The market is completely open for ppl wanting to cause your userbase harm.

Edited February 1, 2014 by Drewbie

[Debug 41]

Previous comments hinted that this was going to be implemented just because the poll was on it's favor. That's simply not the case.

[Skreamzja 160]

This topic should be locked and thrown in the archive.

[Kingy 317]

This topic should be locked and thrown in the archive.

 

You are quite correct. Although the poll is in favor of this, We have taken your feedback on board and have come to the conclusion that we feel this rank is not necessary as we already have the Uploader rank. If you see yourself as an expert nuller then please, upload your files to WebFlake and I'm sure you will be considered for the Uploader rank. 

 

Locked.